The Babadook turns grief into a monster you cannot outrun

There are horror films that scare you, and there are horror films that sit with you long after the credits roll. Jennifer Kent's The Babadook belongs firmly in the second category, using the framework of a supernatural story to ask uncomfortable questions about loss, motherhood, and the way unresolved grief can rot a household from the inside out. Released in 2014 and shot in Adelaide, the picture carries the unmistakable chill of Australian light and suburbia, even when its mood borrows from European folk horror.

Kent had already explored similar emotional terrain in her 2005 short film Monster, a tightly wound piece about a woman still reeling from her brother's death. The Babadook grew from that seed. The feature follows Amelia, a widowed mother whose husband was killed in a car accident while she was in labour, and whose seven-year-old son Samuel is convinced a creature lives in their house. The horror is never really about the creature. It is about what the creature stands in for.

What makes the film resonate so strongly in Australia is the way it weaponises the textures of ordinary life. Custard-coloured walls, a flickering fluoro kitchen at 2 a.m., the tired silence that settles over a house after a child has been put to bed. These details will be familiar to anyone who has walked through a fibro in Brisbane's outer suburbs or sat on a sagging verandah in regional Victoria. Kent turns the everyday into something uncanny, suggesting grief is not an event but a tenant.

The Babadook also carries the weight of an Australian censorship story. When the Classification Board first reviewed the film, it deliberated over how to handle its unsettling content, eventually landing on a rating that allowed adults to see it in cinemas while restricting younger audiences. That friction mirrors the tension at the heart of the story itself.

The shape of sorrow: reading the Babadook as grief

At its core, The Babadook is a film about the thing we are not allowed to name. Amelia is expected to be grateful for her surviving son, to keep the house tidy, to function. Yet she cannot stop replaying the moment her husband died, and that inability to move forward is given a face, a voice, and a top hat. The creature in the pop-up book Samuel finds on his shelf is conjured by a household that has refused to mourn.

Kent is explicit about this without being didactic. The Babadook whispers, "If it's in a word, or it's in a look, you can't get rid of the Babadook." That line is a thesis statement dressed as a lullaby. Once grief has been given language, it cannot be unsaid. You can only learn to live beside it, which is exactly what the film's final act insists upon.

Amelia's spiral: a mother drowning in loss

Essie Davis carries the film with an exhausted ferocity that Australian audiences recognised instantly. Amelia is not a sympathetic protagonist in the usual sense. She is sharp, brittle, sometimes unkind, and the film never flinches from showing why. Her husband died bringing Samuel into the world, and she has spent seven years treating the child as the cause of her loss rather than the proof of her love.

The film's middle act is essentially a portrait of breakdown. Sleep deprivation, social isolation, a job she resents, a sister-in-law whose help she refuses. Kent shoots it all with a steadiness that makes the collapse feel inevitable. Watching Amelia slide toward the basement door, you understand she is not being attacked by something external. She is being asked to face the part of herself she has locked away.

By the time the Babadook takes physical form in the final sequence, the film has already made its point. The monster does not need to be vanquished. It needs to be acknowledged, fed occasionally, and kept in the basement. That grim, pragmatic resolution has kept The Babadook in conversation with therapists and film scholars for a decade.

The house as a mind: visual storytelling

Kent and cinematographer Radoslaw Ladczuk build a visual language that mirrors Amelia's mental state. Early scenes are flat, washed-out, almost clinical. As Amelia's grip loosens, the frame tilts, shadows lengthen, and the house itself begins to groan. The architecture of grief becomes visible.

The Adelaide locations help. The period detail of the home, the steep staircase, the cellar door, all feel grounded in a specific Australian reality rather than a generic gothic template. Even the natural light filtering through the curtains has that dusty, eucalyptus-soft quality you only see in South Australia. That specificity makes the horror feel closer.

There is a recurring motif of windows and frames, suggesting a woman who keeps trying to look out and keeps seeing the wrong thing. When the Babadook finally appears in full, it arrives in the kitchen, in the middle of the day, in the most ordinary room of the house. That choice is more disturbing than any jump scare.

Sound, score, and the voice in the walls

If the cinematography is the film's skin, the sound design is its nervous system. Jed Kurzel's score is sparse and percussive, leaning on low strings and breath-like textures rather than conventional horror stings. The Babadook's voice is deeper than expected, and the film spends long minutes letting that voice rattle around the house before anything actually happens.

Sound becomes a way of externalising Amelia's internal monologue. The scratching in the walls, the way the pop-up book seems to whisper when no one is reading it, the off-screen footsteps that might be Samuel's toy or might be something worse. None of it is explained, and the film is better for refusing to explain. Australian viewers who grew up listening to possums on the roof might find the ambient creepiness especially uncomfortable, because the soundscape borrows from familiar nocturnal noises and twists them.

Films that walk beside grief: companion viewing

If The Babadook left a mark, these films sit in similar emotional territory and are worth seeking out through arthouse cinemas in Melbourne or Sydney, or via Australian streaming catalogues.

  • Hereditary: A grandmother's death ignites supernatural horror that treats grief as a doorway.
  • The Orphanage: A woman returns to her childhood house and confronts the child she lost.
  • Antichrist: A couple retreats to a cabin after their son's death and finds the wilderness has opinions about their marriage.
  • Possum: A deeply unsettling British-Australian oddity about a puppeteer whose past refuses to stay buried.
  • Relic: An Australian film that places three generations of women inside a house consuming them.
  • Under the Shadow: An Iranian film about a mother and daughter during wartime, where a djinn stands in for historical trauma.

If you're hungry for more commentary on how horror translates grief into genre, horror box office tracking offers a useful look at how films about trauma perform with audiences over time. Worth bookmarking the next time you want to see whether slow-burn psychological films are finding their audience or fading into the background.

So if you have not revisited The Babadook in a while, or if you have been avoiding it because you think you already know what it is about, give it another look. Watch it late, alone, in a quiet house. Let it remind you that the monsters we are most afraid of are often the ones we have agreed not to name. Then talk about it, write about it, or stream it with a friend who needs to see it. The Babadook has been waiting in the basement for a decade, and it is not going anywhere.