First of all, my sincere apologies for the lack of posting activity here recently at Samityville on my behalf. I've had some things to deal with over the past week (non-movie related matters) and thus my presence throughout ANOSS has been less than stellar to say the least. Well, it's time to change all that and unleash before you all the partnering list to last week's 'Best Horror Remakes of All Time'. That's right folks - now it's time for the WORST!
Enjoy this compilation and feel free to vent your thoughts on my condemnations, good or bad!
10. The Haunting (1999)
Firstly, I gotta say I didn't mind this remake when it first hit theaters at the end of the millennium. Maybe it was because I was going through a major Phil Tippet visual FX phase (and his work in the film is pretty impressive) or that I saw it with one of my best friends who is very much a film buff like me. But looking back now that 10 years has passed I almost can't believe I considered this over-blown, suspense-less yawner the least bit entertaining. The original film's stunning black & white photography and power of suggestion still make it a masterpiece when compared to Jan de Bont's dreary blockbuster.
9. The Amityville Horror (2005)
When the box office receipts came rolling in, the remake junkies at Platinum Dunes were quick to follow up the success of their 2003 Texas Chainsaw Massacre redux with another re-telling of a much loved horror classic. This time though it was a less-than-impressive recreation of Stuart Rosenberg's 1979 supernatural sleeper The Amityville horror and its reception lead many fans quick to doubt the company's capability to effectively honor their favorite films. Aside from a solid performance by Ryan Reynolds, the film is full of false scares, text-book cliche's and a truly disappointing finale.
8. The Ring Two (2005)
Thankfully I've blocked most of this film out of my mind since seeing it in theaters. Unlike Gore Verbinski's remake of Hideo Nakata's much lauded Japanese original, this hopelessly convoluted sequel is completely devoid of thrills and logic (even for a horror movie dealing with the supernatural) and makes poor Naomi Watts look like she's the unknowing victim of a 110 minute practical joke. To make matters worse, it was Nakata who was chosen to remake his own movie. Talk about shooting yourself in the foot.
7. The Hitcher (2007)
While technically not a straight horror film by definition, Robert Harmon's terrific 1986 original embodies the formula of a stalker flick strongly enough to qualify it's genre validity. Too bad this 2007 version didn't take that into account at all when Platinum Dunes released this redux quickie; the subsequent box office results reflecting it's heartless direction and lame script. While a fine actor in his own right, Sean Bean just can't compete with Rutger Hauer's quiet intensity and frightening on-screen presence. Oh, and I never thought I'd be laughing at the inclusion of a Nine Inch Nails score on the big screen but sure enough this film proved me wrong.
6. Pulse (2006)
While he didn't direct it, horror maestro Wes Craven should have perhaps thought twice about having his name attached to this stinker. Another misguided westernization of eastern terrors, Jim Sorenzo's remake is troublesome in almost every department; hollow characterizations, junky set design, swiss-cheese plot holes, etc, etc. And I doubt seeing the film's original R rated cut would make much difference either.
5. Thirt13en Ghosts (2001)
Now this one is truly painful to watch. For all its stunning set design (and I do mean stunning ), Steve Beck's take on William Castle's charmingly cheesy 1960 chiller abandons any kind of film technique in favor of a virtual shredding of the senses through its schizophrenic MTV editing style and an overbearingly loud soundtrack. Forever underestimating its audience, the film not only makes you feel stupid for having watching it in the first place but also disables your ability to recall anything remotely memorable in its 91 minute running time. Cool KNB makeup effects, though.
4. Black Christmas (2006)
Bob Clark's 1974 original is one of my favorite films of all time and to see its name desecrated the way it was in Glen Morgan's sacrilegious remake was like having Billy suffocate me with a plastic bag. The lazy notion of "exploring the backstory" of a film's villain as the sole reason to cast out a remake, let alone having such exposition handled as badly as it was here, is enough to drive any fan up the wall. Half the reason the original film remains as frightening as it is is the complete absence of reason behind Billy's madness and the fact you only see as much as a peeking eye or a hand reach out of the darkness to indicate his identity. Morgan's screenplay turned out to be unbearably dumb and the multiple reshoots did nothing to make matters better.
3. The Wicker Man (2007)
Even one of Hollywood's most eccentric actors couldn't help Warner Bro's save one of cinema's worst ever remakes. With a laundry list of inherent problems too comprehensive to include here, Neil LaBute's horrendously laughable interpretation of one of Britain's finest horror movies is a genuine oddity of disastrous proportions - a film perpetually confused of its intent as either a straight comedy or serious horror film. Perhaps the only reason this movie isn't higher in the list is due to its pure entertainment value as one of the worst films you will ever see. Guaranteed.
2. The Fog (2005)
One of the more truly embarrassing moments in horror history is the bone-chillingly bad redux of John Carpenter's minor 1980 classic. It's as if director Rupert Wainwright and Sony Screen Gems took everything that made the original so eerie and simply threw it into the mist, leaving nothing but a soggy PG-13 horror with no mood, no thrills and no sense. And if that sounds bad, it also ends with two ghosts kissing. Yep, you heard right.
AND THE WINNER IS...
1. Psycho (1998)
The expression on Anne Heche's face should tell you everything you need to know about this, the worst ever horror remake. In many ways it's not necessarily the worst remake in terms of film technique or production capability, but rather director Gus Van Sant's sheer blasphemous intent for having the film exist purely to serve as a shot-for-shot retelling of Alfred Hitchcock's immortal masterpiece - this time in color(!) - that make it the crowning defiler of original horror in my books. I simply ask, "why"?
What say of you, cretans?